Great interest in linguistic science is continued to metonymy and metaphor as one of the basic cognitive processes that require explanation. Many different classifications have been proposed starting with Aristotle, other Greek, Roman and medieval scholars, modern critics and linguists, more recently by the Groupe de Liege. P. Koch, A. Blank and B. Nerlich; Todd and Clarke link their cognitive approach to metonymy to the rhetorical tradition. The cleavage between literal and figurative language has recently been challenged by R.W. Gibbs. Y. Lotman defines metonymy act as much-specific selection and elimination of non-essential. According to Umberto Eco, the metaphorical replacement (substitution) is based on metonymic practice (Eco 1984). Zh. Lacan pointed out that metonymy based on the connection of words (word-to-word connection), while the metaphor is the replacement of one word by another. R. Jakobson determined that for typical metonymy adjacencies (and, accordingly, syntagmatic relations) . This issue, according to I. Tolochin , and more relevant for the study of fiction, where the difference between the categorization of contiguity